<%= link_to "Link name", { :controller => 'controller_name', :action => 'action_name' }, :class => 'someclass' -%>
También se puede hacer más simple:
<%= link_to "Link name", 'action_name', :class => 'someclass' -%>
http://nhocquay2001.wordpress.com/201...id-to-link_to-method-in-ruby-on-rails
Un manual de python en portugués :)
http://conocimientoabierto.es/curso-objetivo-programacao-python/325
Algo de info sobre cómo funciona Qt y cómo funcionará el próximo Qt5
http://www.versvs.net/comment/110252#comment-110252
As an extension to CSS, LESS is not only backwards compatible with CSS, but the extra features it adds use existing CSS syntax. This makes learning LESS a breeze, and if in doubt, lets you fall back to CSS.
http://lesscss.org
The moral is obvious. You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. (Especially code from companies that employ people like me.) No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code.
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html
Script para borrar todas las tablas de una base de datos sql desde el terminal y sin droppear la base de datos
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-do-i-empty-mysql-database
-
http://www.carlescliment.com/material...B3n-continua-agile-levante-enero-2012
-
http://friendly-machine.com/posts/2012/drupal-base-themes
-
http://jotarp.org/2012/06/drupal/drupal-vs-django.html
Thus, the goals of a programming system should be:
to support and encourage powerful ways of thinking
to enable programmers to see and understand the execution of their programs
A live-coding Processing environment addresses neither of these goals. JavaScript and Processing are poorly-designed languages that support weak ways of thinking, and ignore decades of learning about learning. And live coding, as a standalone feature, is worthless.
http://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming