-
http://blog.capwatkins.com/google-gla...=Feed%3A+svbtle+%28Svbtle+Featured%29
comparación de inserción de panorámicas 360 con tecnología google y tecnología autónoma.
Una vez más parece que el soft libre no está (aún) para alegrías :(
http://optimistadigital.es/insercion-de-panoramicas-360o#comment-25
my feeling is that Google is playing the long game in mobile while Apple is missing the cloud piece and Samsung is just a hardware player at this point. And the stock market understands that.
Gráfica que muestra un +35% de cotización en bolsa para Google Year-on-Year marzo 2012 - marzo 2013. »
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2013/03/short...m-thinking-vs-long-term-thinking.html
-
http://rinzewind.org/archives/2013/03.../adios-google-reader/#comment-1257731
más sobre los codecs vp8 y h.264, parece que google ganó, lo cual bueno... bien por google, pero el problema son las patentes en sí.
http://www.osnews.com/story/26849/Google_called_the_MPEG-LA_s_bluff_and_won
Almost three years after Google released its WebM video encoding technology as a "free" and open alternative to the existing H.264 backed by Apple and others, it has admitted its position was wrong and that it would pay to license the patents WebM infringes.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/0...ebm-codec-infringes-mpeg-h264-patents
According to PatentBolt, Google has filed a patent to bring backside controls to future Android devices. The finger swipes and scrolls could help users turn a page in an e-book, peruse through an online article, or flip back and forth between photos and shuffle through songs. A conceptual drawing related to the patent shows an index finger scrolling through an article on the backside of what looks like a Nexus handset.
...
Apparently Apple filed a patent like this back in 2006 for its tablet devices, but the depiction shows two hands holding onto the tablet, with contact points on either side of the device.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/0...de-controls-on-future-android-devices
el concurso anual de asaltar navegadores usando páginas web ya da sus frutos: firefox y chrome son ya algo más seguros... los usuariosd e ie no han tenido tanta suerte
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/Au2lTCI9nU4
Google Docs is being used for phishing. Oxford University felt that it had to block the service because Google isn't responding to takedown requests quickly enough. Think about this in light of my essay on feudal security. Oxford University has to trust that Google will act in its best interest, and has no other option if it doesn't.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/03/oxford_universi.html
However, it is not just the device manufacturers. It is Google killing the brand. They moved away from it when Android Market became Google Play, and they are distancing themselves even more now.
They want Google to be the brand, not Android.
Risky business? I am not sure. Who cares about Android? Developers. Only developers.
Even if you water down the brand, developers will know it ;-) It does not make a difference. You are not going to lose developers because you are de-emphasizing the brand.
However, having two brands confuses consumers. Google is planning to open flagship stores. They have bought an hardware manufacturer. They are changing, and they want Google front and central.
http://www.fabcapo.com/2013/02/google-has-killed-android-brand.html
