Se filtran las instrucciones de al qaeda del magreb islámico para evitar ser detectados por drones de vigilancia.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/a...ocId=26c299308f07403f9f1fed2c65530d54
Por el hecho de que la especificación recomienda pero no fuerza, es posible ocupar todo el disco duro del visitante con LocalStorage
http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/...f-a-website-grabs-all-your-disk-space
The reason it matters whether LBT is covered is that if it is then it would either be necessary to join (£££) the regulatory process or to face certain (rather than not quite certain) financial ruin should someone commence a legal process about any of the content of the blog — and since our group’s academic work is occasionally contentious, that’s not just a theoretical risk.
It’s clearly most unsatisfactory that legislation this important is so unclear, and that the Government are determined to rush it through Parliament within days rather than thinking the complexities through… the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act is usually cited as the poster child for knee-jerk legislation that is much the worse for the rush to put it on the statute books. We seem to be heading the same way here.
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2013/03/22/dangerous-blogs-act
The book on Moniz is that he believes in the long-term benefits of basic research (to which I say amen, and amen again), pointing out that DOE itself was a significant player 30 years ago in what has led to today’s smart drilling boom. On the other side of the ledger are policies that support short-term industrial-type projects using things like tax incentives and grants. Solyndra of course comes to mind. Put it yet another way: the tension is between scientists looking for support and investors looking for free government money.
...
Scientists, much less physicists, are rare in the Imperial City’s mix of lawyers, lobbyists, advocates, and pundits, rarer still in the inner circles of power. If we end up with a history of two physicists at the Cabinet level, might we hear on the Washington D.C. cocktail party and fund-raising circuit, to borrow a phrase — “Well, a physicist friend of mine once told me….” I know. It’s probably too much of a stretch.<>
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markpmill...hysicist-be-the-next-energy-secretary
-
http://www.europapress.es/portaltic/s...-10-llega-windows-20130226152038.html
«Somos conscientes de que las universidades hemos cambiado el chip de la sociedad. Hoy hablamos de la sociedad del conocimiento y el conocimiento se genera dentro de la universidad.»
http://www.cincodias.com/articulo/eco...ce-universitarios/20120305cdscdieco_3
The patents that threaten us are often called “software patents,” but that term is misleading. Such patents are not about any specific program. Rather, each patent describes some practical idea, and says that anyone carrying out the idea can be sued. So it’s clearer to call them “computational idea patents.”
http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/richard-stallman-software-patents
Todo puede ser verdad, contando los números de una determinada manera.
http://www.mundogamers.com/noticia-lo..._musica_verdad_o_mentira-ps3.862.html
La vigilancia autoritaria como mediación.
http://www.somosprimates.com/2012/06/mediacion-en-primates